Fluidized Bed Dryer — Quick Sizing Calculator

Interactive hydrodynamic design tool · Ingo Hiersche Engineering

Inputs







Drying Duty

Operating Window

u_mf m/s
u_op m/s
u_t m/s
Fixed bed Bubbling Turbulent Transport
  Geldart:
Operating velocity exceeds terminal velocity — particles will be entrained!
Aspect ratio L/D > 2 and u > u_ms — slugging may occur. Consider a wider, shallower bed.
Geldart C particles are cohesive and difficult to fluidize. Consider vibration or mechanical agitation.
Geldart D particles — consider spouted bed design instead of conventional fluidized bed.

Velocities

u_mf (selected)
u_op = N_f * u_mf
u_t (Haider-Lev.)
u_t (iterative drag)
u_mb (Abr. & Geldart)
u_ms (slugging onset)
Regime

Dimensionless Numbers

Archimedes Ar
Re_mf
Re_op (at u_op)
Re_t (at u_t)
Fluidization # u/u_mf
Richardson-Zaki n

Bed Behaviour

Bed expansion L/L_mf
Expanded bed height
Expanded voidage eps
Bed dP (fluidized)
TDH (freeboard min.)
Min. vessel height
Aspect ratio L/D

Moist Air Properties

Relative humidity
Humidity ratio x
Dew point T_dp
Sat. pressure p_sat
Dry air density
Moist air density
Density correction

Gas Flow & Fan Sizing

Gas density rho_g (moist)
Gas viscosity mu_g
Bed cross-section A
Volume flow (actual)
Volume flow (Nm3/h)
Mass flow (dry air)

Drying Duty — Mass & Energy Balance

Dry solids throughput
Evaporation rate
Product output rate
Inlet humidity ratio x_in
Outlet humidity ratio x_out
Outlet relative humidity
Required dry air flow
Specific air consumption (SAC)
Specific energy consumption (SEC)
Heater duty (ambient → inlet)
Heat rate for drying
Thermal efficiency
Initial moisture must be greater than final moisture for drying.
Outlet air is near or above saturation — reduce feed rate or increase inlet temperature.
SEC is high (> 6000 kJ/kg). Consider heat recovery or higher inlet temperature.
Adiabatic dryer assumption (h_in ≈ h_out). Heat losses typically add 5–15%. Ref: Mujumdar, "Handbook of Industrial Drying", 4th ed., Ch. 3.

u_mf Correlation Comparison

CorrelationConstantsNotesu_mf [m/s]
Ergun (1952)Full equationNeeds eps_mf, phi
Wen & Yu (1966)C1=33.7, C2=0.0408Most widely used
Grace (1982)C1=27.2, C2=0.0408Geldart B/D
Chitester (1984)C1=28.7, C2=0.0494High pressure
Spread between correlations indicates uncertainty. For final design, validate with experiments or CFD.
References: Ergun (1952) Chem. Eng. Prog. 48(2):89; Wen & Yu (1966) CEP Symp. Ser. 62:100; Grace (1982) Can. J. Chem. Eng. 60:353; Chitester et al. (1984) CES 39:253; Haider & Levenspiel (1989) Powder Tech. 58:63; Richardson & Zaki (1954) Trans. IChemE 32:35; Darton et al. (1977) Trans. IChemE 55:274; Horio et al. (1980) AIChE Symp. Ser. 76(196):136; Kunii & Levenspiel, "Fluidization Engineering", 2nd ed. (1991); Mujumdar, "Handbook of Industrial Drying", 4th ed. (2014), Ch. 3, 8; Buck (1981) J. Appl. Meteorol. 20:1527 (saturation pressure); Hyland & Wexler (1983) ASHRAE Trans. 89(2A):520 (enhancement factor); Alduchov & Eskridge (1996) J. Appl. Meteorol. 35:601 (dew point inversion); Keey, R.B. (1992) "Drying of Loose and Particulate Materials", Ch. 2 (mass/energy balance); Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 9th ed., Ch. 12 "Psychrometry" (enthalpy, SEC).